Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Housekeeping...

Kerry put forward the suggestion that the host kick of the evening with some questions on the book that (if possible) are posted on the blog prior to the meeting, for those that like to read with the questions in mind. Kerry also asked that I re-post the initial book club info, here 'tis...


Selecting this months book

Whilst not a rule it would be nice if there is an underlying assumption that the books we’ll be reading have reached some type of literary standard, by way of award or recommendation from fellow authors, literary associations etc. That said, I’m sure there are some undiscovered great reads out there, so if you‘ve found one, bring it to the table.

There is no theme and members are free to choose from whatever genre interests them, be it crime, fiction, non fiction, historical, drama etc. In this way we might be exposed to books we might not normally read.

If a book is selected that you have read before, perhaps take the opportunity to read it in a different light, with a view to discussing certain aspects/themes/issues of the storyline at the end of the month. Perhaps read with a pencil and make notes as you go.

Meetings

If those attending could bring some food to share, that way it’s not totally up to the host to provide everything. If it is your turn to host and you’d prefer to have the evening at a pub/winery/cafĂ©/someone else’s house, do so.

Books are selected two months in advance to give everyone time to obtain copies.

Thoughts on discussion

I don’t want this to just be about ‘did you/didn’t you like it’, a run through of "did you like it?" at the beginning of meetings is really damaging to conversation and just promotes a series of closed statements such as liked it, loathed it and then we can all go home. If people can try to avoid saying liked it or not, but perhaps discuss themes and issues as they relate to you or society, which will be more discussion promoting. Yes, like at school! (my inner nerd doesn’t come out very often, indulge me)

Following discussion we all rate the book out of 10 (after vigorous debate, half marks are allowed). There are numerous websites available on reading group guides and suggested discussion topics available for whatever book you may choose. Perhaps the host could get things moving with a series of questions relating to the text, prior to individuals opining about whether they liked/disliked the book.

I’m just trying to set the tone for some reading, discussion, sharing of good books, exposure to new ideas and differing viewpoints and of course a little drinking wine and talking crap with some other people who are genuinely interested in literature?

If you know anyone that likes to read bring them along.

Book for May

Kaye has slected this months book - The Secret Life of Bee's, Sue Monk Kidd

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Theory of Flesh by John Binius

Thought provoking, disquieting, and often confusing, the Theory of flesh certainly disturbed me. Renee Quite, a character who is not quite right takes us on a twisted, disjointed journey of re-self discovery. Along his philosophical journey we are introduced to many unusual characters with their own preverse stories.
Group consensus (the three of us who had actually read the book): Just beyond our minds reach are the ideas, meanings, and vocabulary necessary to make the links between life and the apparently related bizaar events that occur.
Colleen 3 (read the first three chapters) believed that the writing was over desriptive and did not excite interest.
Tahnee 3 disquieting, didnt get it, would have like to but kept reading anyway.
Trilby 6 throught provoking, would like to be able to read the book with greater insight.
Cara 5 third time reading and still confused, posed many questions and is one of the few books that has disturbed and stimulated (intellectually).
Thanks Ladies was great to get your thoughts on the book.
See you all on the first tuesday of May after we have all dutifully read Half the Skye by Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl Wudunn