Good Evening Fellow
Literary Lovers,
Unless I get a couple of hours reading done tonight I am pretty sure ''We of the Never Never” shall remain unfinished on my part so my questions may be a little off the mark, but here goes....
1. Does the prose adequately describe the Australian Bush; the conveyance of size, isolation, vastness, ..... Could you have dated it as a book written in the early 20th Century. If so what were the indicators?
2. I was easily confused by the pseudonyms used for many of the characters. Does this illicit a sense of disconnectedness or highlight a classist tone throughout the story.
3.There is a considerable degree of 'noble savage' myth in her perception of the Aboriginal characters. Did she lack understanding or comprehension of the injustices imposed upon them?
4. Did you feel gender stereotyping was exaggerated to highlight how willing she was to 'muck in'?
5. In what ways was 'little missus' a pioneer of woman folk living and working in the bush or was the tone patronising and condescending?
6. Why did Cheon succeed where she failed in managing the household?
8. Is it a book that emphasis's humanity and the equalising nature of the bush? In what ways?
9. In the book
Jeannie describes the Aboriginal's as ''...children who needed
someone to lead them''.
Is this approach of
whites to Aboriginals still prevelant today?
10. They could ''Live with anything except tea'' Could you?
Hope to see you all
tomorrow night.
Irene
59668480
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.